{"id":274,"date":"2026-06-25T20:07:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T20:07:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274"},"modified":"2026-06-25T20:07:08","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T20:07:08","slug":"the-supreme-courts-new-expansion-of-the-second-amendment-is-genuinely-deranged","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

This is part of <\/em>Opinionpalooza<\/em>, Slate\u2019s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court. Keep up with all of our Supreme Court coverage and analysis by <\/em>signing up for weekly email roundups<\/em>. The best way to support our work\u2014and unlock exclusive legal analysis\u2014is by joining <\/em>Slate Plus<\/em>. (If you are already a member, consider a <\/em>donation<\/em> or <\/em>merch<\/em>!)<\/em><\/p>\n

Read more This Is Why We Can\u2019t Have Nice Things<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The Supreme Court\u2019s 6\u20133 decision in on Thursday confirms our worst fears about the supermajority\u2019s Second Amendment jurisprudence: It is a freewheeling policy project utterly unmoored from history that allows the Republican-appointed justices to implement their preferred gun laws under the thin guise of judicial review. These justices struck down Hawai\u02bbi\u2019s law restricting guns on private property not<\/em> because the Constitution required them; to the contrary, the state proved beyond doubt that its statute was deeply rooted in history and tradition. Rather, the supermajority killed the law because it was offended that Hawai\u02bbi would dare try to mitigate the violence that SCOTUS has unleashed through its radical, incoherent gun rights jurisprudence. Justice Samuel Alito\u2019s opinion for the court bristles with annoyance toward the state government\u2019s attempts to protect people on private property from getting shot to death. Constitutional law has given way to six justices\u2019 ad hoc nullification of any law that favors human life over the paranoid obsessions of gun enthusiasts.<\/p>\n

Wolford <\/em>involves a Hawai\u02bbi law that prohibits individuals from carrying guns on private property unless the owner affirmatively consents. (California, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York have enacted similar statutes\u2014all now likely invalid.) The state intended this rule to respect property rights by creating a default rule that nobody takes a firearm onto someone\u2019s land without their permission. Gun advocates promptly challenged it under , the Supreme Court\u2019s 2022 decision holding that a burden on the right to bear arms is unconstitutional unless it has enough \u201chistorical analogues\u201d from the distant past. They claimed that Hawai\u02bbi could not identify a sufficient number of these \u201canalogues\u201d to justify its law.<\/p>\n

There are key problems with this argument, as Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson explained in dissent. First, Bruen <\/em>ostensibly compels courts to figure out what conduct the Second Amendment protected when ratified; if a contemporary law infringes on that conduct, it is presumptively unconstitutional. But, Jackson wrote, \u201cthere is no right to carry a gun onto private property without the permission of the owner.\u201d The majority did not even contest this point, because it is uncontestable. Instead, Alito ratcheted up Bruen<\/em>\u2019s level of generality: Rather than asking if Hawai\u02bbi\u2019s law actually burdens a concrete, well-defined right, he merely asked if it \u201champers\u201d an individual\u2019s ability to take their gun anywhere they want. Because it does, he concluded, it must be supported by appropriate \u201chistorical analogues.\u201d<\/p>\n

Then, having defined the right to bear arms as broadly as possible, Alito demanded granular specificity from older statutes that echo Hawai\u02bbi\u2019s. The state offered many; its list included 18th<\/sup>-century laws in Pennsylvania, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York that required permission from a property owner before carrying a gun on his land, as well as 19th<\/sup>-century laws in Florida, Louisiana, and Texas that restricted the unapproved carrying of guns on \u201cthe premises or plantations of any citizen.\u201d Even under Bruen<\/em>\u2019s stringent standard, aren\u2019t these statutes enough to shore up Hawai\u02bbi\u2019s modern version?<\/p>\n

No, Alito wrote, because each is \u201cdistinguishable\u201d from Hawai\u02bbi\u2019s. The state\u2019s true goal, he asserted, is to enshrine \u201clocal attitudes\u201d and \u201ca Hawaiian tradition\u201d that \u201cdisfavor the carrying of guns\u201d in public to prevent violence. By contrast, the 1700s laws were mere \u201canti-poaching\u201d rules meant to mitigate \u201charms and risks associated with unauthorized hunting.\u201d So, under Bruen<\/em>, they are not \u201crelevantly similar\u201d to Hawai\u02bbi\u2019s in terms of \u201chow and why\u201d they were enacted. Meanwhile, the 1860s laws were post\u2013Civil War \u201cBlack codes\u201d meant to oppress former slaves. So Alito dismissed them as a \u201ctainted artifact\u201d that did not qualify as Bruen <\/em>\u201canalogues.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more What We Can Learn From Trump\u2019s Continued Obsession With Punishing Minnesota<\/a><\/p>\n

Each of these moves infuriated Jackson. To start, she bemoaned the majority\u2019s \u201cboundless\u201d Second Amendment that \u201cpresumptively protects\u201d the right \u201cto carry anywhere and everywhere.\u201d Alito\u2019s \u201cnewfound understanding of the first step of Bruen<\/em>,\u201d Jackson wrote, \u201cobliterates any need for reference back to original meaning.\u201d After Wolford<\/em>, \u201cjudges are now free to insert any meaning they desire into the text of the Second Amendment and then demand the government provide analogues to fit that interpretation.\u201d<\/p>\n

As to those analogues: Jackson ridiculed Alito\u2019s refusal to acknowledge that they show how \u201cstates routinely required affirmative consent for armed carry onto private property\u201d at the founding. The 1700s statutes were not, in fact, limited to poaching, but were also meant to prevent \u201carmed trespass, property theft or damage, and gun violence, whether intentional or accidental.\u201d Lawmakers helpfully wrote down these aims, which Alito ignored. The purpose of these laws, Jackson wrote, was to \u201cvindicate property rights\u201d by mitigating \u201cconcerns associated with violations of those rights by armed individuals on private land.\u201d That, of course, is precisely <\/em>what Hawai\u02bbi seeks to do today.<\/p>\n

And what about the Southern laws from the post\u2013Civil War era that protected private property from armed trespassers? Jackson acknowledged that \u201cconfronting the origins of these laws is certainly uncomfortable. The Black Codes were ugly. And racist. And deplorable.\u201d But that does not \u201cautomatically render these laws irrelevant to a fair assessment of the right to carry firearms.\u201d If the majority chooses to \u201ctether its Second Amendment analysis to facts about America\u2019s past, it must contend with our nation\u2019s entire<\/em> history, warts and all.\u201d Excluding laws that appear \u201cugly\u201d to modern eyes empowers the court \u201cto cavalierly pick and choose which parts of the historical record count,\u201d giving it \u201cdiscretion to cull the history\u201d in \u201cservice of a single goal: preventing the government from responding to issues arising from the possession of firearms.\u201d<\/p>\n

There is a deeper problem with Alito\u2019s highly selective approach: Virtually all of the laws that SCOTUS credits as relevant to the Bruen <\/em>analysis were written by racist white men. As Hawai\u02bbi Supreme Court Justice Todd Eddins , \u201cthe people\u201d who had the right to bear arms \u201cexcluded people based on gender and race.\u201d These laws\u2014not just those contained in the Black Codes\u2014were written by and for heterosexual white males who held varying levels of animus toward women and minorities. Indeed, many of the nation\u2019s earliest gun laws were explicitly motivated by racism. Why do these laws count under Bruen <\/em>while the Black Codes don\u2019t? How can today\u2019s judges determine when legislatures harbored discriminatory intent when enacting gun laws centuries ago?<\/p>\n

These unanswerable questions, like Wolford <\/em>itself, show what a doomed endeavor Bruen <\/em>has been from the start as an attempt to do law. Far from restraining judges, the decision gives them maximum latitude to cherry-pick history in service of their preferred outcome\u2014which, for Republican appointees, is usually a ruling against gun safety. This approach to the Second Amendment is wildly inconsistent with state sovereignty and self-rule, allowing unelected judges to topple democratically enacted gun restrictions based on dilettantish historical divination. There is no law to be found in Wolford<\/em>. It reads not like the work of a court, but of a super-legislature imposing its ideological hostility to firearm regulations on a citizenry that never consented.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more After a Spicy Primary Night, Who\u2019s Winning the Fight for the Democratic Party\u2019s Future?<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court\u2019s 6\u20133 decision in Wolford v. Lopez on Thursday confirms our worst fears about the supermajority\u2019s Second Amendment jurisprudence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":273,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[120,18,11,73,29,15],"class_list":["post-274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudence","tag-guns","tag-judiciary","tag-jurisprudence","tag-opinionpalooza-2026","tag-samuel-alito","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged - Home Move Chronicle<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged - Home Move Chronicle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court\u2019s 6\u20133 decision in Wolford v. Lopez on Thursday confirms our worst fears about the supermajority\u2019s Second Amendment jurisprudence.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Home Move Chronicle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-25T20:07:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e\"},\"headline\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-25T20:07:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274\"},\"wordCount\":1295,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/63007196c5f55a2c6742f124185e001c.avif\",\"keywords\":[\"Guns\",\"Judiciary\",\"Jurisprudence\",\"Opinionpalooza 2026\",\"Samuel Alito\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Jurisprudence\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274\",\"name\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged - Home Move Chronicle\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/63007196c5f55a2c6742f124185e001c.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-25T20:07:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/63007196c5f55a2c6742f124185e001c.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/63007196c5f55a2c6742f124185e001c.avif\",\"width\":1560,\"height\":1040},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=274#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Home Move Chronicle\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged - Home Move Chronicle","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged - Home Move Chronicle","og_description":"The Supreme Court\u2019s 6\u20133 decision in Wolford v. Lopez on Thursday confirms our worst fears about the supermajority\u2019s Second Amendment jurisprudence.","og_url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274","og_site_name":"Home Move Chronicle","article_published_time":"2026-06-25T20:07:08+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e"},"headline":"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged","datePublished":"2026-06-25T20:07:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274"},"wordCount":1295,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/63007196c5f55a2c6742f124185e001c.avif","keywords":["Guns","Judiciary","Jurisprudence","Opinionpalooza 2026","Samuel Alito","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Jurisprudence"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274","url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274","name":"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged - Home Move Chronicle","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/63007196c5f55a2c6742f124185e001c.avif","datePublished":"2026-06-25T20:07:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/63007196c5f55a2c6742f124185e001c.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/63007196c5f55a2c6742f124185e001c.avif","width":1560,"height":1040},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=274#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Supreme Court\u2019s New Expansion of the Second Amendment Is Genuinely Deranged"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/","name":"Home Move Chronicle","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/homemovechronicle.com"],"url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}