{"id":238,"date":"2026-06-18T23:07:17","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T23:07:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238"},"modified":"2026-06-18T23:07:17","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T23:07:17","slug":"neil-gorsuchs-new-gun-rights-decision-is-a-love-letter-to-legal-weed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238","title":{"rendered":"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Supreme Court affirmed a marijuana user\u2019s right to bear arms on Thursday, holding that criminal charges against him for owning a gun while using cannabis violate the Second Amendment. The unanimous decision in rejected the federal government\u2019s authority to disarm consumers of marijuana absent evidence that they regularly used the drug to the point of incapacity. In doing so, the justices frankly acknowledged the widespread legal and social acceptance of cannabis in America today\u2014a remarkable turnabout for a court that has long treated all drug users as presumptively dangerous criminals.<\/p>\n

Read more The Supreme Court Issued an 8\u20131 Ruling on Plea Deals. The Accord Won\u2019t Last.<\/a><\/p>\n

On this week\u2019s episode of Amicus, co-hosts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed Hemani<\/em>\u2019s selective libertarian sympathies and how the unanimous opinion papered over the court\u2019s ongoing disagreements about how to read and apply the Second Amendment. A preview of their conversation, below, has been edited and condensed for clarity. For the remainder of their discussion of Hemani<\/em>, listen to this week\u2019s Slate Plus bonus episode.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n

Dahlia Lithwick: In a lot of ways, Justice Neil Gorsuch\u2019s majority opinion becomes an ode to legal marijuana. And maybe we shouldn\u2019t be surprised: He lived in Colorado when that state legalized recreational cannabis in 2012. He went to bat for gummy aficionados during oral argument. The upshot of his opinion is basically that marijuana\u2019s kind of chill and fun, and the founders would have liked it?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Mark Joseph Stern:<\/strong> Yes, which tracks with Gorsuch\u2019s comments during oral argument. He clearly does not see marijuana as an especially dangerous or harmful drug, especially as compared to alcohol. One of the points he makes over and over again throughout this opinion is that the founders themselves were heavy drinkers. He writes that John Adams had \u201ca tankard of hard cider\u201d with his \u201cdaily breakfast,\u201d while James Madison \u201cconsumed a pint of whiskey daily\u201d and George Washington \u201coften drank three glasses of madeira in the evening.\u201d Thomas Jefferson enjoyed \u201c3 or 4 glasses\u201d of wine with dinner. And just a few days before the Framers signed the Constitution, they got absolutely smashed.<\/p>\n

Gorsuch\u2019s point is that these guys got drunk a lot<\/em>. The people who ratified the Second Amendment, who created our system of government, frequently got trashed\u2014and they probably didn\u2019t think they could be lawfully disarmed because of it. And that\u2019s the point of inquiry: In the late 18th<\/sup> century, alcohol was heavily used, but people who did so could still own guns. So surely people who use marijuana today have someSecond Amendment rights too.<\/p>\n

It is amazing that on this polarized court, which can agree on nothing, we got a unanimous decision that day-drinking is a good thing. It is clearly the solution to all that divides us. Now, I don\u2019t want to be too fast and loose. There is<\/em> actual legal reasoning in this opinion, to the extent you can call any application of the extremely vaporous <\/strong>\u201clegal reasoning.\u201d But Gorsuch does say that \u201chabitual drunkard\u201d laws from the founding aren\u2019t sufficiently analogous to the modern statute to pass muster. I think everyone was hoping that this case would help Bruen<\/em> become more coherent or defensible. Is the test still a mess?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yes, because Gorsuch does the move that\u2019s so common under Bruen<\/em>: He acknowledges that an old law looks kind of<\/em> similar, then finds some reason to distinguish it. Here, he does a close reading of laws punishing \u201chabitual drunkards\u201d at the founding and says they applied only to people whose drinking \u201crendered them practically incapacitated and incapable of managing their affairs.\u201d So it wasn\u2019t just regular drinking that made you a criminal \u201chabitual drunkard\u201d; it was drinking enough to destroy your life and make you actively dangerous.<\/p>\n

In this case, there was no evidence that Ali Hemani\u2019s marijuana use ruined his mental capacity. And as Gorsuch points out\u2014flaunting his knowledge of the legal market\u2014the United States doesn\u2019t even treat marijuana as a particularly dangerous drug anymore. He notes that weed is legal in most states in some form, and the federal government has already rescheduled medical cannabis, with recreational weed to follow soon. Sure, you can use too much of it. But did Hemani? The government didn\u2019t say; as Gorsuch wrote, for all we know, he used only \u201ca mild gummy as a sleep aid a few times a week.\u201d So, at the end of the day, this guy seems trustworthy enough to bear arms. But that doesn\u2019t clear up the doctrine whatsoever. If anything, it further shows how the Bruen<\/em> test leaves room for judges to say that defendants with whom they sympathize have a right to bear arms, while defendants with whom they don\u2019t sympathize do not.<\/p>\n

Read more J.D. Vance\u2019s Book Is Actually Two Books<\/a><\/p>\n

I do want to flag one aspect of this case that is very interesting to me as a longtime court watcher: It wasn\u2019t even 20 years ago that SCOTUS ruled, in <\/strong>a famous case<\/strong>, that a high school student had no First Amendment right to hold up a sign that said \u201cBong Hits for Jesus\u201d at a school event. <\/strong>I\u2019m old enough to remember<\/strong> that during oral argument, the conservative justices were absolutely overwhelmed with Reefer Madness<\/em>\u2013style drug-warrior hostility toward marijuana. Even a reference on a jokey sign was too much marijuana to tolerate in our world. And now it seems the court, on a dime, is so OK with pot that it says users can bear arms. This is such a huge shift in a couple of decades, right?<\/strong><\/p>\n

It\u2019s a huge shift. During oral argument in that case, Justice Antonin Scalia was aghast that anyone would think public school students have a right to advocate for legal marijuana. He also famously contorted his vision of the commerce clause to allow the federal government to prosecute people for having one homegrown cannabis plant at home for personal medical use. The dude hated drugs, as have a lot of other conservative justices.<\/p>\n

I think this shift shows, first of all, how much culture really does permeate the Supreme Court. By 2026, the justices know that taking a gummy sometimes to sleep does not make you a dangerous person. Gorsuch points out that according to some studies, more Americans use weed than alcohol, which is probably a net benefit for public health. On top of that, Hemani<\/em> indicates that the court is not always going to let the government use controlled-substance restrictions to infringe upon other civil liberties. We saw this in the \u201cBong Hits for Jesus\u201d case, when the court basically said that because weed was illegal, the government could crush the First Amendment rights of students who endorse it. We still see this in so many cases involving the Fourth Amendment, when police use the alleged smell of marijuana as a pretext for an illegal search. And we saw this during Prohibition, when SCOTUS upheld many infringements on the Fourth Amendment and other civil liberties because the authorities were targeting alcohol.<\/p>\n

To be clear, I don\u2019t love<\/em> this decision. Every validation of Bruen<\/em> unfortunately takes us a little bit further down that Second Amendment road and makes it harder to reverse in the future. But if we accept that there is<\/em> a constitutional right to bear arms, the ruling fundamentally makes sense and reflects a relatively reasonable understanding of marijuana and its users. It refuses to diminish civil liberties\u2014or at least one favored civil liberty\u2014out of judicial animosity toward drug use. On the whole, that\u2019s a positive sign.<\/p>\n

The justices may be on the same page about marijuana, but they are really<\/em> not on the same page about the Second Amendment, despite the fact that this was a unanimous decision. So before anyone assumes that the liberals have made their peace with the flaming dumpster fire that is Bruen<\/em>, can you talk about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson\u2019s concurrence, in which she refuses to play along?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Jackson, joined in full by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, is still not on board with Bruen<\/em>. She writes that \u201cBruen<\/em> is unworkable\u201d because \u201cit imposes on judges the unfamiliar and difficult tasks of sifting through centuries-old evidence in order to answer contested historical questions\u201d and \u201cresolve contemporary problems.\u201d The test is also \u201cvulnerable to inconsistent and arbitrary application,\u201d which we arguably see here: A majority of the court is sympathetic toward marijuana users, so Bruen<\/em> magically gives them a right to bear arms. Would that be true of other drugs, like psilocybin? There was a lot of talk about psychedelics during oral argument, and some of the justices seemed to think that would take it too far.<\/p>\n

So Jackson wants us to know that Bruen <\/em>is still clearly broken. She argues that the court should return to something like heightened scrutiny, asking whether a gun law is \u201csufficiently tailored\u201d to promote a \u201clegitimate purpose.\u201d Judges already do that in all kinds of cases, and they could do it here. Jackson is still fighting this fight; she won\u2019t give in and pretend that Bruen<\/em> is actually workable. She wants the court to do real law.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Just Let Him Have This<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

How exactly did these six justices come together in such an important case?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":237,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[120,163,31,73,15],"class_list":["post-238","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudence","tag-guns","tag-marijuana","tag-neil-gorsuch","tag-opinionpalooza-2026","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNeil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed - Home Move Chronicle<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed - Home Move Chronicle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"How exactly did these six justices come together in such an important case?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Home Move Chronicle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-18T23:07:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e\"},\"headline\":\"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T23:07:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238\"},\"wordCount\":1567,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/560553036a8c4ae992e8b58e69ffa725.avif\",\"keywords\":[\"Guns\",\"Marijuana\",\"Neil Gorsuch\",\"Opinionpalooza 2026\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Jurisprudence\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238\",\"name\":\"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed - Home Move Chronicle\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/560553036a8c4ae992e8b58e69ffa725.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T23:07:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/560553036a8c4ae992e8b58e69ffa725.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/560553036a8c4ae992e8b58e69ffa725.avif\",\"width\":1560,\"height\":1040},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?p=238#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Home Move Chronicle\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/homemovechronicle.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed - Home Move Chronicle","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed - Home Move Chronicle","og_description":"How exactly did these six justices come together in such an important case?","og_url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238","og_site_name":"Home Move Chronicle","article_published_time":"2026-06-18T23:07:17+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e"},"headline":"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed","datePublished":"2026-06-18T23:07:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238"},"wordCount":1567,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/560553036a8c4ae992e8b58e69ffa725.avif","keywords":["Guns","Marijuana","Neil Gorsuch","Opinionpalooza 2026","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Jurisprudence"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238","url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238","name":"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed - Home Move Chronicle","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/560553036a8c4ae992e8b58e69ffa725.avif","datePublished":"2026-06-18T23:07:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/560553036a8c4ae992e8b58e69ffa725.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/560553036a8c4ae992e8b58e69ffa725.avif","width":1560,"height":1040},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?p=238#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Neil Gorsuch\u2019s New Gun-Rights Decision Is a Love Letter to Legal Weed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/","name":"Home Move Chronicle","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/75d86f25dbb870f24983ccc831d1ec4e","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/homemovechronicle.com"],"url":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=238"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/237"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homemovechronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}